Wednesday, July 11, 2007

Vespa Singapore Spray

Change the order of names

"The name to a greater or lesser extent is a person's identity with his family and also to society. When society imposes a priori the continuity of the name in the male line, it sends the message that only men is that right, thus automatically imposes a precedence over women, as the family identity allows continuity only if there are children, and ends when there are daughters, the result is that it affects the dignity of women, which is clearly discriminatory. What is most evident when manifestly is the surname of the mother than the father, who has a historical tradition and therefore a great emotional significance, symbolic or identifying their descendants, being therefore more representative of the family identity.

In most foreign law, the woman lost her last name should be replaced by that of her husband, his other was added to the marriage. At this point the law of Chile is an exception, since even when married women continue to use their paternal and maternal surnames.
Almost all foreign law, the continuity of the family name was only in the male line of descent, however at present there is the possibility that the continuity of the family name is the female line, if that is the choice of the individual.
The continuity of the name in the male line forms a tradition linked to the predominant type of family in society, which in the case of Chile has gradually ceased to be patriarchal to become a type "transitional" with a tendency towards equality, as such, recognizes the importance of social and economic role now has women in relation to man and in this new context, justifies the possible continuity of the name in the female line. How many women are heads of household? How many women take up their children without any male support?

has discussed the possibility that the brothers did not carry the same names ... However, it must be remembered that only siblings can be a father or mother alone, and in that case will not carry the same paternal and maternal surnames, but only one of them, leaving aside the case of a person who, for any reason other name is known for more than five years and decides to change it, then neither his name, will coincide with that of his brothers.

Chilean law allows a person to change their last names when for some reason is known by another name for over five years, last name is usually the mother (treatment standards and fame), the most frequent cases are those artists could be at school even when there is more affinity with the mother of the child and naturally he or she is known by the name of it, if in these cases the law allows the name change why could not afford other cases?

The proposed amendment to the initiative of the Deputy EMS, only intended to complement existing legislation that allows the change of surnames in the Chilean legislation, and extends only for the purpose of establishing a principle of equality between the sexes. At the same time is consistent with those reported in the State Constitution and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, which guarantees men and women equal rights, as well as with the provisions of the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women, established in more specific terms for both the husband and wife the right to choose a family name.

Upon recognition of the role that women have today, has extended the recognition of the right compared to the female genealogy that can possibly be more significant than the male genealogy.
city remains open to debate an innovative and perhaps too progressive for our idiosyncrasies macho ...
As can be noted that statistical data such a standard part for several years in countries like USA, Canada, Britain, Spain and Argentina, among others. "
this project is currently under discussion in the commission's Family Chamber of Deputies.
personal way, I can say that I anticipate a positive impact on the ability to toggle the order of names, especially in those cases where the mother takes a prominent role in the formation of family as a type "unicéfala" with the absent parent, as would release a strong emotional charge many children to their chagrin, have a first name that involves feelings such as abandonment, contempt, lack of love and ultimately a complete lack of identity.


BILL ARTICLE ONE: The following amendments to Law No. 17,344 Authorizing the Change of Names and Surnames in Cases Indicated.

dye Agréganse the following letters to Article 1:
"d. When the applicant wishes to spend their first and last names using maternal and paternal or after either pass to be composed
e. Where the applicant wishes to use either the paternal or maternal surnames of their parents or grandparents. ".

ARTICLE TWO: Insert the following amendment to Decree-Law No. 2128 on Organic Rules Civil Registration Service.
You replaced
Article 126 by the following:
"Art 126. By registering a birth will be designated by the name registered to appoint the person requesting the registration.

If a child born in marriage or not marriage is recognized by both parents, then will the name of the father and the mother immediately. However, the parents by agreement may place first name of the mother and then the father's name, in this case should proceed in the same way with all children together.

In the case of a nonmarital child by the father or mother, you will be entered with the surname of the father or mother who has requested a complete record of his paternity or maternity.
* was drafted by the parliamentary advisor Leonardo Estrada-Brancoli at the initiative of Rep. Maria A. Source

Thursday, July 5, 2007

Canoe Style Birthday Cakes

Family Issues

These past weeks I have been heavily laden with hearings in Family Court ... Divorce, mainly. Starting
system so bad, so slow, it is difficult even for lawyers handling these courts, I must say that I find it increasingly unpleasant to have to represe ntar this type of case.
It is impossible to get justice! And behind much of a problem there are children, single women and hardened heads of household, men who wish and strive to see their children ... in short, people who are suffering and that you should never lose sight.
I despair, enraged me alone ... and powerless I have, to keep going and validating this unjust system ... I feel like a piece, a true "white stick", why hold out? If we are auxiliaries of the administration justice! Then he revealed. But then should I hold back. After all, courts are people who make mistakes as much as I may.
There are good judges, perhaps the youngest, who are more assertive, are agile, have good memories .. I do not know. But I find it easier to establish a dialogue and are at the height of the sponsors. Because there are many godly magistrates watching everything from the top of their podiums sideways, clueless judges pending the time, audio, minor issues, which ultimately are self-boycott the spirit of the new laws ...
is amazing! how to treat and in-depth expose sensitive cases and complex if they give 15-minute blocks for the audience and which has been expected for months ... and after hours of waiting for the blessed "call." I have admitted in 2005 that claims not yet come to trial. I have divorces that after four preparatory hearings yet to be fully suspended. And I have customers and clients so anxious and unhappy with everything, that not even hear the explanations that lawyers should give.
is absolutely exhausting. As this new law sought to streamline and bring transparency to all, giving broad powers to judges and de-formalize the procedure and everything has become a mess ..
In the provinces the thing goes a little better .. is organized and everything is more orderly. In San Miguel is a disaster, perhaps worse than Santiago.
But I'll have to arm myself with patience. Luckily, the Law Society made an agreement with the judiciary and now, we are chartered, we have access, via internet, to resolutions.

I have consulted a lot about the bill that authorizes the change of names in a future post I will focus on that topic.

appreciate the comments and emails I have received and continue answering questions.
See!

Thursday, May 10, 2007

Anette Dawn Planet Suzy

emails as evidence

I just finished reading a letter from the counterpart in a trial of larger foods, where it opposes the provisional decree food, arguing among other things, opposing counsel, or I, acting in "deplorable lack of professional ethics" by making use of two e-mails they had sent me a way to negotiate the possible terms of all the trials that bind us ... Colleague keeps saying ... "in due course he said that no decent lawyer fails to act ethically , and that criticism is made because in its application stated that he would offered me a pension for a one million pesos ... "
In reading the letter, could not fail to amaze me, the violence of his first tenor and second some ignorance on the subject, because out of ethical question, there is the probative value of this type of communication, "e mails or emails" not prejudice to a party, base their claim on them .
regard, I found much interesting material, and I'd like to share ...
doctrine almost unanimously considered that the email is not comparable to traditional mail, so then it would come under the "media" to the same treatment (legal and moral) that a confidential letter, because that between e mail and correspondence differences as
1 .- The e-mail lets you know who issued it, more precisely, what was sent and terminal in which it was received. Situation different from the written correspondence that does not necessarily require a sender.
2 .- The content of the correspondence principle can not be read by others, however, we note that the email is not so, because while browsing the cyberspace can be easily accessible to third parties.
3 .- Unlike what happens with traditional mail, digital message "is not unique" since creation is manifold. From the moment the user sends the message, not only have created multiple copies but that they are scattered all over the world, depending on your point of departure and arrival of the message.
4 .- The person receiving the e-mail have the ability to duplicate ad infinitum . Copies created in the memory of the computer being used to create the message, are available to the user who can at will, destroy it, save it or copy it, etc.
So, this will determine the characteristics of e-mail :
* Multiplicity Copy.
* The necessary intervention of third parties who also have copies of them and route the messages continued.
* The possibility that the system operator ( ISP) to access messages and monitor and / or modify its contents, etc.
Law No. 19,799 "On electronic documents, electronic signatures and certification services of the firm" in its article 5 says that electronic documents may be presented in court and will fully test in accordance with the general rules . Therefore, however would accept a challenge ethical the intrusion of such "communications" between the trial lawyers, I can not help but observe that provide evidence and therefore a way of asserting the claim raised in my case.
The code of professional ethics of the Bar Association sanctions the violation of professional secrecy includes in it those talks for a transaction that failed ( art. 11), nevertheless, due to the old dates this body of law, which is not aware of the time is that I think are not included in such secrecy couriers both upset my partner , because as I played before, conversations or communications are not strictly "private."
In any case the court decided not to give rise to opposition from the food counter and temporary remained firm until the final ruling enactment.
.....
One last comment:
Advancing the ethics code, I found an article that talks about "the deal between colleagues," meaning that it must be a fraternal and respectful, which celebrates the profession and refrain from use malicious or insulting expressions ...
Perhaps my colleague has not read the entire code?

Monday, May 7, 2007

Saa7130 Hl Multimedia Capture Devive

Waiting to call me at the scheduled hearing ... Where it all begins

that would rido start with something more positive, but hey .... so it goes. Today was
trial hearing in the Family Court of Santiago. The scheduled time was 10:00 AM and I waited patiently the call ... My client did not arrive, nor the counterparty. After reviewing my schedule, call the office, check out some outstanding payments that I realize this week and re-read the history of the coming trial folder, I started to look and listen ...
Beside me sat a man about 50 years. I was uneasy. Moved forward and revised paper. It was a subpoena. Within minutes I realized I was not alone. A child with him. A cute little boy, tidy, dressed in school with his pack on the shoulders and with tears in his eyes that contained so it does not escape him. He was the son of the lord. I hardly looked at each other, but the boy was defiant and rebuked. I was not enough to hear it whispered and spoke through clenched teeth. Dad lowered his head and moved his paper citation. As time passed, child and father seemed more uneasy. I realized that the mother expected. Only He could hear the boy told his dad .. "I said, I said" ... Until the official left the room 4 (which was the same as mine) and called loudly .... it was for them. The man showed him the subpoena and handed his card, explaining that the "defendant" had not arrived ... they were, when the boy shouted "here comes my mom!". Then the officer (as diligent as permit this atrocious system) says: "anyway we will give a new time, because at the time of call were not two .." "But, Miss I wanted to drop the case!" said the man ... "Oh that's another thing," said the official, and after a few minutes, ushered into the courtroom. The boy wanted to go, but obviously not allowed. And he sat beside me, staring at the ground and moving fast fast one leg. I felt almost without looking at the containment of their crying. And I decided to talk. The do not want to answer anything, look at me. He rose from his seat. I was scared. Sure! children .. I do not talk to strangers .. I explained that I am a lawyer children (so I understand) and sat down again beside me. I told him not to be afraid and if I wanted to tell me or make me questions and I could explain. Moved his head and said no. How old are you? "11" answer, and you to school now in the afternoon "if" I said .. and trouble to ask me could they be prey to my mom? is that my dad says she is bad and put a complaint of domestic violence, says it takes and not true .. and sighed relieved. "But your dad said he would withdraw the claim, so now the judge is talking to them to fight no more .." I replied. And your dad is good with you? "Yeah, so well behaved." And mom? "Also, but before my dad left, hit him several times to my Dad I think that's why he left, got bored. Anyway my mom and have a partner - he almost resigned"
As I spoke, I did love in her hair, took her hand and tried to contain him .. I explained that the judge was a woman and understand that it could not separate the mother of his child (because that was the fear he had) I asked him to try not think bad things and that discussions were between mom and dad .. But nothing could have said was sufficient, the child was somewhere else ... rather, inside the courtroom.
parents came every man for himself. The mother took the child by the hand and did not give even a second for the dismissal of the father. In a second left the waiting room.
And I stayed there. Paralyzed. With anguish and helplessness. Why do our children will have to suffer this sort of thing? "That boy could be my child? And the anguish that was .. (as hypo penalty saved) and his face! ... Why? How to avoid?
And it was not who was right or not, who hit who, as I would have worried about being a lawyer for a party. It was that little boy. That was left out. Instead of being at school playing ball, a court was explaining to a lawyer if unknown, using legal classification as an expert. And becoming more mature man of pure pain. Then along with wanting to start from there, I thought, really wanted to be, as I said this tiny, a lawyer for children.

Saturday, May 5, 2007

Groping In The Bus Movies



I stand simply as The Advocate. Women
32, entitled for 6, a lover of life and justice, delighted with his career and eager to help and be a real contribution ...
Let's see how it turns out!